|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
1240
   |
Posted - 2015.04.01 22:49:14 -
[1] - Quote
Saede Riordan wrote:These are really small changes, I'm not sure what sort of effect it'll have yet on fitting but none of these changes seem to gimp the ships too much, (at a glance).
That's actually a larger hit than you think. These ships run on very narrow margins with the oversize modules they tend to fit.
Choices will have to be made.
Yaay!!!!
|
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
1260
|
Posted - 2015.04.13 23:01:53 -
[2] - Quote
Two utility highs... Let's all say it together..
Assault frigates... Rest in pieces.
Yaay!!!!
|
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
1266
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 12:00:49 -
[3] - Quote
Regarding the assault frigates..
Maybe just a very minor change is needed.
They currently have a MWD bloom reduction of 50%.
Maybe make that 100%.
Yaay!!!!
|
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
1266
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 13:30:21 -
[4] - Quote
William Rokov wrote:This t3d shows us the problem with assault frigs, its nice time to think about them and their niche in pvp.
Honestly they should look at both interceptors and assault frigates. Could just merge a few of them (so instead of 2 interceptors and 2 assault frigates, just turn them into a new type of frigate fleet
1 interceptor (fast light tackle), one assault frigate (dps tackle), one heavy tackle frigate (tank, tackle). Throw out one of the ships for each race.
Just thoughts, use the d3 forms and make a frigate based on each, one fast tackle, one good dps, one good tank.
Yaay!!!!
|
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
1267
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:11:17 -
[5] - Quote
Thanatos Marathon wrote:If you block T3Ds from small FW complexes AFs have a niche again (although a pretty small one).
It's weird because there is a big blur with the interceptor and assault frigate.
I just think there is one too many.
Yaay!!!!
|
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
1267
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 17:25:32 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Alexis Nightwish wrote:Fozzie, have you considered further increasing the build cost to help offset the disparity of power between T3Ds and AFs by increasing the disparity of price between them? The build cost changes in this pass are pretty significant, I don't think we'll be likely to go further all at once.
Adjusting cost isn't the answer.
Frigates (specifically assault frigates, and oddly enough interceptors) need to be reviewed because there is a new Power-creep that happened with the T3 destroyers.
Cost won't balance it out, its more of a fundamental scale of gameplay.
Its pretty well known that Assault Frigates need a pass, but when you make that pass, don't ignore interceptors.
Yaay!!!!
|
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
1303
|
Posted - 2015.04.30 18:06:56 -
[7] - Quote
Small rail guns are pretty pos. tried to kill two pods I had a rammed with 75mm rails on a keres.
I had to slow down to under 100km to hit them. Then I had to shoot them about 5 times to pop them.
Terrible example I know. I just found it funny that I couldn't hit a pod with that due to tracking (pods are small though).
Yaay!!!!
|
|
|
| |
|